Does using antidetect browser have the same effect as connecting to a remote computer p2p?
No, using an antidetect browser and connecting to a remote computer via P2P are different. An antidetect browser masks your browser fingerprint to avoid detection, while P2P remote access connects you directly to another computer, allowing you to use its environment and resources. Both methods serve distinct purposes and are not interchangeable.
That’s my question indeed. How are the not interchangable?
What am I missing here!
Because Antidetect browsers mask browser fingerprints for anonymity, while P2P remote access gives you control over another computer’s environment. They serve different purposes and are not substitutes for each other
Right that’s what’s happening. But in practice, would a website recognise their difference?
Can I confidently use antidetect for the same purpose? Without bothering other people abroad?
Websites usually detect your browser settings and IP address not the exact method you’re using to access them. Antidetect browsers can imitate what you’d achieve with P2P remote access by changing your fingerprints and location data, but they can’t fully recreate the environment of a real remote computer. In most cases, antidetect browsers work well for similar purposes, though advanced detection methods might still pick up on subtle differences.
Ok, thank you. It’s usable that way.